Bright Star Would I Were Stedfast as Thou Art Analysis Meter

Close Reading: Vivid Star! Would I Were Steadfast Equally Thou Art

Central Terms:

Ingemination - Repeated sound of the first consonant in a series of multiple words.

Apostrophe - Straight addressing something, someone or an abstract concept not present in the poem.

Volta -The turn of thought or argument in a sonnet.

Iambic Pentameter -Line of 5 feet of unstressed followed by stressed syllables.

Personification -Man qualities given to animals, objects or ideas.

Speaker - The vocalism narrating the verse form. Not necessarily the poet.

It has been a long fourth dimension since I have done a close reading, and with all my blogs on theory and criticism, I recollect its important not to lose sight of our appreciation for the art. Then in today's blog we will go back to the basics of appreciating and admiring poetry for what it is. I have chosen to look at this sonnet past John Keats -Bright Star! Would I Were Steadfast As K Art.

BRIGHT star! would I were steadfast equally k art—
Not in lone splendour hung aloft the night,
And watching, with eternal lids apart,
Like Nature's patient sleepless Eremite,
The moving waters at their priestlike job	5
Of pure ablution round earth's human shores,
Or gazing on the new soft fallen mask
Of snow upon the mountains and the moors—
No—yet all the same steadfast, still unchangeable,
Pillow'd upon my off-white dearest's ripening chest,	10
To feel for e'er its soft autumn and slap-up,
Awake for ever in a sweet unrest,
Still, still to hear her tender-taken jiff,
And then live always—or else swoon to decease.

This is a cute poem from Keats, and information technology all hinges on a paradox; an unresolveable conflict within the mind of the speaker. The speaker, gazing in admiration at the night sky, longs to be unmoving, unchanging and as eternal every bit the star higher up that is observing the world below. While he longs for the star's unchanging country, he does not wish to exist solitary, merely rather, "pillowed upon my fair dear's ripening chest". These 2 desires of the speaker contradict one another. He cannot both love and be eternal. To dear he must be human and therefore he tin can not be eternal like the star. While he longs for this moment of beloved to terminal forever, he is enlightened that it is not possible then he hopes he may "swoon to death" in the moment.

As nosotros can tell by its 14 line construction written in iambic pentameter, this poem is a sonnet. There are many variations of the sonnet, but most are based on i of two major forms: the Petrarchan/Italian sonnet or the Shakespearean/English language sonnet. The interesting thing about this sonnet is information technology seems to nestle somewhere between the two. It has the structural elements of the Shakespearean sonnet; the iii quatrains in the rhyming scheme abab cdcd efef and followed by the couplet gg, merely its thematic segmentation more closely follows the Petrarchan tradition of an octave setting followed by a sestet response. In the first 8 lines we have our attending on the nature of the star and then the volta shifts the focus to the speaker, his love and the resolution to the paradox.

In the verse form's opening, the speaker establishes the image and nature of the star. He does this through the literary device of apostrophe; directly addressing the star: "Bright star! Would I were steadfast as k art" This opening line establishes, from the very start, the eternal nature of the star. The alliteration of "star" and "steadfast" non only accentuates that unchanging nature, simply as well introduces the theme of the speaker'south transience. This is built on through the personification of the star: It is "patient" and "sleepless" and has "eternal lids". These are all homo qualities that focus on the eternal and unchanging nature of the star. The star is too "aloft", out of reach and unattainable, which feeds into the notion of the speaker's unattainable desires. I think it is likewise interesting to note that, rather than someone looking up at the star, we have the star doing the watching down on World. This has the effect of pushing the speaker's presence out of that opening octave; giving us, not an interpretation of the star by the self, but rather, a more harmonious acceptance of nature for what it is.

Every bit nosotros motion into the 2d half of the octave nosotros receive a description of what the star is watching. At that place are two images that sally and both of them suggest the idea of pureness. The first of these is the "moving waters". The waters accept on a spiritual significance as they have the task of "ablution" - a religious purification, "a priestlike task" that is performed on the "human being shores". The 2d of these images is that of the snow and the metaphor of "the new soft-fallen mask" that covers "the mountains and the moors." I recall these are interesting images placed together and the speaker in some way identifies with them both. Perhaps he feels these acts of purification or spiritual cleansing are a means to transcend the limitations of human life and fend off the changing and temporary nature of being man.

The  discussion "No" in the 9th line marks the sonnet'south volta and the switch in theme as it moves into the sestet. We become this parallelism, or repetition, of "even so" in line 9, "still steadfast, still unchangeable" and then once again later in line 13, "Still, still to hear her tender breath". This farther reiterates the desire for eternity equally nosotros have this continued repetition and again reverts back to the earlier alliteration highlighting those iii words "star", "steadfast" and "still". The focus is now away from the star and on to the speaker's ain beingness, and Keats looks to mirror the imagery of the octave to juxtapose the two. The moving waters washing the shore in lines 5 and 6 are now echoed in the "soft autumn and swell" of the adult female'southward breast in line 11. We as well reach this betoken of conflict where the speaker is wishing for something the star does not accept; steadfastness without solitude. He longs to observe the "notwithstanding unchangeable" nature of the star inside the context of human dearest. He is "pillowed" on his love'due south breast. The breast is a symbol of fertility that is besides described as "ripening", information technology is a representation of organic life, everything the star tin can non exist. Information technology is far removed, "aloft" and "watching", just unable to "feel". The conflict comes to a head in the couplet where we are offered two mutually sectional possibilities . The speaker determines that he can live in the sensual experience of love, which, because time seems to slip away, seems to be "for ever". Failing that, he hopes that he might "swoon to death", swoon significant to be overcome by extreme emotion, and thus he dies at a moment of purest love and happiness.

This sudden mention of death at the poem'due south end really grasps the reader contrasted with the gentle images of life, but this reversal is not actually a surprise as the speaker continually wedges himself into this unsolvable predicament. The poem meanders leaving ideas hanging equally "Not" on line ii and "No-" on line 9 interject into the poem'southward flow. The poem's central unity is a mess of threads that can't be sorted, only abandoned. If nosotros isolate that closing line we see it embodies the contradictions of the verse form's whole: "then alive forever  - or else swoon to death." The beauty of the paradox is that we practise observe a common ground between death and eternal life: they last forever. Thus resolving the speaker's problem as both dying and living for eternity will make that moment of perfect elation final forever - he will be "steadfast".

sawickifornevere.blogspot.com

Source: http://achehir.blogspot.com/2016/04/close-reading-bright-star-would-i-were.html

Share this post